San Diego State University’s Independent Student Newspaper Since 1913

The Daily Aztec

Hirshman’s $400,000 salary is approved by CSU Board despite Governor’s letter

by Sandy Coronilla

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Antonio Zaragoza/ Photo Editor

This morning, the California State University Board of Trustees approved the $400,000 salary of new San Diego State President Elliot Hirshman despite Gov. Jerry Brown’s letter to Chairman Herbert Carter asking the board to rethink the criteria for determining administrators’ salaries.

The letter sent today calls attention to the hard hits and “painful sacrifices” that CSU faculty and students have had to endure because of the recession.

“It is in this context, and prompted by the salary decision you are about to make today, that I write to express my concern about the ever-escalating pay packages awarded to your top administrators,” Brown wrote.

The meeting held in Long Beach set off a Twitter firestorm by higher education reporters and advocates in attendance.

Despite Brown’s letter and Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s comments addressing the relatively high amount of the salary on a day when the board also apporved a 12 percent tuition hike, CSU Chancellor Charles B. Reed encouraged the approval of Hirshman’s salary.

Read Gov. Brown’s letter here

“This system has not increased compensation for executives for four years,” Reed said, according to a tweet by the California State Student Association.

SDSU Associated Students Vice President of University Affairs Mina Azim, present at the board meeting, said she is glad to learn Carter will be moving forward with the reevaluation.

“I understand why President Hirshman’s salary was approved as the CSU strives to set a competitive edge to ensure the excellence of our leaders within the CSU. Dr. Hirshman will provide excellent leadership to SDSU,” Azim wrote.

The CSU Committee on University and Faculty Personnel approved the $350,000 salary. The compensation package includes a $1,000-per-month vehicle allowance and reimbursement for moving costs as well as for expenses incurred in selling Hirshman’s Virginia residence. In San Diego, he will occupy a house provided by the university.

The salary will also include $50,000 from San Diego State University Foundation sources, for a total of $400,000 — an amount higher than that of former SDSU President Stephen L. Weber, who was compensated $299,435 annually according to university records.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


9 Responses to “Hirshman’s $400,000 salary is approved by CSU Board despite Governor’s letter”

  1. Ernesto Gomez on July 12th, 2011 2:44 pm

    Elliot Hirshman has already demonstrated his lack of leadership by accepting this salary. Real leaders (for example, Washington at
    Valley Forge) suffer with the troops (in this case, faculty and students).


  2. Testie on July 12th, 2011 7:38 pm

    Can anyone please dial Weber and ask him if he’s still interested in coming out of retirement? He was cheaper and qualified. This guy appears over-qualified for the job. Minimum wage ring any bells Mr. HIRSHMAN???


  3. B K on July 12th, 2011 8:35 pm

    People should be OUTRAGED!!! Two increases in the past two years for the tuition at Cal State campuses (10 & 12%). How can they justify one person in the educational system making as much as the President of the United States?!!! I keep hearing “we have to be competitive with the other schools!” That is such a frudulent case – each school uses that excuse to leap-frog over the other. Outrageous GREED!!! United to stop the greed – its destroying the United States as we know it.


  4. brokenschool on July 13th, 2011 5:51 am

    This is soooooo typical. Big fat raise for all! Yeah! Maybe after our country is internally destroyed, the government can take over 🙂


  5. Fefe on July 13th, 2011 8:14 am

    If it is his choice of moving to CA, he should be paying for his own relocation expenses. Every body need to drive to work, why should he get extra $1000 car allowance? Eveybody who want to live under a root has to pay rent or mortage, but not him, just because he is president? This is a bad start. He is already abusing the students. Not mentioned, but his meals will be reimbursed when he travel. With all these expenses paid for, he can live on min. wage salary.


  6. Alexander Marconi on July 13th, 2011 10:27 am

    Tru leaders do not require such high compensation given the current times. A deal should have been made to compensate based on performance. Start with a $200K base then give bonus as that person brings in the goods to the school. All higher up admins should work on a commission basis.


  7. Dennis on July 14th, 2011 1:22 pm

    wow! seems like the salaries go up for important people. SDSUPD, dont look for a pay raise anytime soon. But that shouldn’t be a surprise, havent had one in 6 years!


  8. Dennis on July 14th, 2011 7:24 pm

    Wonderful I’m
    Glad there is money to give a 100k raise to this guy but the sdsupd has not had a raise in 6 years! And continue to be the lowest paid. Oh and apparently no one is supposed to know because the chief there has told all the employees they cannot say anything or they will get reprimanded. Can someone remind me if this is still the United Stantes?


  9. Vnapc on July 17th, 2011 7:49 am

    Don’t forget the SDUS football coaching staff:

    The football coaching staff is comprised of 10 people whose combined annual salaries equal $2.275 million.

    The focus of schools is to make money, not to educate the students. This type of continual rate increase has gone on for 15+ years.
    The schools appear to be unwilling to stop the spending, much like our local, city, state and federal governments. Unfortunately it leaves the students who graduate, saddled with debt and low salaries (if they can find a job). Those who don’t graduate usually can’t pay back the student loans and their credit is completely ruined for years, and possibly, their entire lives. Isn’t greed wonderful?


Commenting on our site is a privilege. We want our readers to add their point of view to every story but ask that they keep their comments relevant to the topic at hand. We will remove comments and possibly ban users who do the following: (1) Use vulgar or racist language, (2) Threaten harm of any sort to staff, commenters or the subject of an article, and (3) Leave spam in their comment. If you have questions about these rules, please contact our Editor in Chief at:

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.