The Daily Aztec

Library snoozes cause enforcement confusion

Back to Article
Back to Article

Library snoozes cause enforcement confusion

Students hard at work in the Malcolm A. Love Library.

Students hard at work in the Malcolm A. Love Library.

Kelly Smiley

Students hard at work in the Malcolm A. Love Library.

Kelly Smiley

Kelly Smiley

Students hard at work in the Malcolm A. Love Library.

by Paulette Villicana, Staff Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Security concerns about how to enforce a policy against sleeping in the Malcolm A. Love Library are an ongoing issue.

Kinesiology senior Jacquelyn Ponce said she sees people sleeping in the library regularly.

“I see people taking naps at least every day when I’m in the library,” Ponce said.

The library’s code of conduct, accessible online, says: “Sleeping by students beyond a short study nap is discouraged due to safety concerns. Community users are reminded that the library is open to them for research purposes; sleeping is not allowed.”

William Staninger, the library security coordinator, said that because the policy states short naps are OK for students, the issue becomes establishing what is a short nap.

“I have had students in the past in the 24/7 area (who) were coming in every night and they were just going to sleep,” Staninger said.  “Now that, they can’t do. Basically they’re using it as their home.”

Journalism senior Stephan Early said he is in the 24/7 area often and takes naps when he has to pull all-nighters.

“During the day, I see people napping all the time but in these late hours, definitely,” Early said.

Early said he lives near campus, but comes to the 24/7 area for computer access.

“For me personally, when I take a nap, it’s for the sake of saving time,” he said. “I could go home and come back but that’s 30 minutes I could be working on something.”

Staninger said that he avoids waking people up intentionally.

“If I notice someone sleeping a lot, I’ll wait until they’re awake, I let them know our policy that we don’t allow people to sleep in here for long periods of time and usually that’s the end of it.” Staninger said. “Very rarely has it gone beyond that.”

However, there have been concerns with non-students sleeping in the library — homeless people in particular.

“We are open to the public, and it’s really hard to not let someone in because of the way they look or the way they appear,” Staninger said.

He said because it is a public library, they cannot deny people access to the building. As part of their code of conduct, if non-students are sleeping or bothering people they can ask them to leave.

“I can’t say ‘you can’t come in because you look like a homeless person,’” Staninger said. “Unless you started checking the IDs of every single person, then you’re kind of discriminating at that point.”

After the library closes at 10:30 p.m. SDSU students can stay after hours to study while all non-students are asked to leave. On occasions, the library staff will make exceptions.

Staninger said specific requirements regarding non-SDSU students permitted in the 24/7 after-hours is unclear, but that because SDSU students are paying for the facilities, they want to make sure that the 24/7 area is strictly for SDSU students after-hours.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
1 Comment

One Response to “Library snoozes cause enforcement confusion”

  1. Andrew on November 1st, 2017 9:55 am

    Homelessness is an issue for all of us in SoCal, and I too would prefer not to have to face this wherever I might want to be. This simply is another case of NIMBY.

    Public libraries face a similar issue. Personal care homes often take their residents on outings. Frequently you will see groups of severely handicapped people there. Most of these people cannot read. They make many of us uncomfortable. At the same time, these are public spaces, and these people have as much right to be there as anyone else.

Commenting on our site is a privilege. We want our readers to add their point of view to every story but ask that they keep their comments relevant to the topic at hand. We will remove comments and possibly ban users who do the following: (1) Use vulgar or racist language, (2) Threaten harm of any sort to staff, commenters or the subject of an article, and (3) Leave spam in their comment. If you have questions about these rules, please contact our Editor in Chief at:

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.