The Daily Aztec

Fraternities hammered with ‘social moratorium’

SDSU's Interfraternity Council handed down a strict edict over the weekend to the 15 organizations it governs

Back to Article
Back to Article

Fraternities hammered with ‘social moratorium’

File photo.

File photo.

Petey Dyer

File photo.

Petey Dyer

Petey Dyer

File photo.

by Will Fritz, News Editor

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

San Diego State’s Interfraternity Council placed all 15 of its active member fraternities on a social moratorium late Friday.

The moratorium prohibits fraternities under the council from hosting or engaging in events with alcohol at their chapter houses, according to an announcement from the council.

“The social moratorium is a result of ongoing concerns related to alcohol and other cultural issues within the community,” the announcement said.

The council came to the decision after two fraternities were placed on interim suspensions last week, resulting in six fraternities — more than a third of the council’s membership — on an “elevated” judicial status, the statement said.

University spokesperson Cory Marshall said in a statement two fraternities were subjects of “ongoing investigations” but could not confirm whether those were the two that the council statement was referring to.

“When they are complete and the decisions are rendered, it will be published on the fraternity/sorority life website,” she said.

According to SDSU’s Greek Life page, three other fraternities are currently on suspensions or probations:

  • Kappa Alpha is on probation with stipulations through the rest of the month for alcohol violations during the university dry period.
  • Phi Gamma Delta is on suspension in abeyance followed by probation through June 2019 for alcohol violation and harassment.
  • Sigma Nu is on probation with stipulations through October 2018 for alcohol violations.

Phi Kappa Theta was also removed from campus late last year.

“With more than a third of chapters on a status, the IFC believed that it was necessary to take action to mitigate any further incidents for the safety of the IFC and SDSU communities,” the IFC statement said.

The purpose of the moratorium, the council said, is to “provide the opportunity for reflection and planning” within the council’s member fraternities.

“It is important to note that this is a decision IFC student leaders have chosen to impose on themselves,” Marshall said.

The council covers the largest contingent of fraternities on campus — the “social” organizations. It does not cover sororities, cultural or academic fraternities.

A Delta Upsilon member speaking on the condition of anonymity said he heard on Friday that there was “a chance” Greek organizations could be suspended for the rest of the semester, then was told later that day about the moratorium by one of his fraternity’s executive members.

“Everyone is really sad and angry about how it happened,” the fraternity member said.

Fraternities included in the Interfraternity Council will now be allowed to host only one event with alcohol at a third-party location for the rest of the semester. The event must have licensed bartenders and security, be registered with the council and must not have any official or unofficial pre- or post-parties or gatherings.

No one under the age of 21 may be served alcohol at the event, and fraternities won’t be allowed to hold the event if they violate the moratorium beforehand.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Responses to “Fraternities hammered with ‘social moratorium’”

  1. Jebidiah sprungfeld on March 12th, 2018 11:04 pm

    We aren’t on a social moratorium, you’re on a social moratorium

  2. snorky on March 20th, 2018 8:13 am

    waah. daddy, you bought me friends, why can’t you buy me outta this.

  3. Whybother on April 12th, 2018 10:33 pm

    I pay my own tuition, rent and dues. Please try again

  4. Numya on August 13th, 2018 2:44 pm

    This was a self-imposed social moratorium so we all could take some time to figure out how we can best move forward without further incidents and somehow we’re being ridiculed for it?

  5. Blake king on March 21st, 2018 12:25 pm

    “Fraternities hammered with ‘social moratorium’” is an interesting title to choose for a self-imposed restriction.

Commenting on our site is a privilege. We want our readers to add their point of view to every story but ask that they keep their comments relevant to the topic at hand. We will remove comments and possibly ban users who do the following: (1) Use vulgar or racist language, (2) Threaten harm of any sort to staff, commenters or the subject of an article, and (3) Leave spam in their comment. If you have questions about these rules, please contact our Editor in Chief at:

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.