City council votes unanimously to move forward with SDSU Mission Valley plan

Rendering+of+The+Hub%2C+a+portion+of+the+planned+Mission+Valley+campus+expansion.
Back to Article
Back to Article

City council votes unanimously to move forward with SDSU Mission Valley plan

Rendering of The Hub, a portion of the planned Mission Valley campus expansion.

Rendering of The Hub, a portion of the planned Mission Valley campus expansion.

Photo courtesy of SDSU

Rendering of The Hub, a portion of the planned Mission Valley campus expansion.

Photo courtesy of SDSU

Photo courtesy of SDSU

Rendering of The Hub, a portion of the planned Mission Valley campus expansion.

by Michael Cline, Assistant News Editor

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






The negotiations between San Diego State and the City of San Diego over the university’s expansion plans in Mission Valley moved forward on Monday.

In a San Diego City Council meeting on Nov. 18, members voted to unanimously approve a requested council action to proceed with the process of drafting a purchase sale agreement document.

The requested council action now sends the PSA drafting process to the City Attorney’s office.

The office will be responsible for drafting and formatting the PSA and submitting the document to city staff for analysis.

At the meeting, SDSU also presented its revised offer of $86.2 million for 135 acres of land at the SDCCU Stadium site. 

The parcel also includes Murphy Canyon Creek, land the university agreed to purchase from the city at the request of city officials.

At the meeting, SDSU President Adela de la Torre and JMI Realty’s John Kratzer, a member of the university’s negotiating team, discussed the details of its updated offer.

“We believe we are close to the finish line,” Kratzer said.

De la Torre touted the project’s $3 billion in local economic value. SDSU Mission Valley will also bring 15,000 new students to SDSU and create thousands of new jobs for the region, she said.

The university aims to present the finalized PSA, financing plan and EIR to The California State University Board of Trustees on Jan. 28, 2020. The university also hopes the city council will deliberate on a finalized agreement in February, with a closing date the following month.

The timeline for approval is in line with the university’s goal to open its new 35,000 seat multi-use stadium in time for the 2022 NCAA football season. The opening matchup against the University of Arizona Wildcats also marks SDSU’s 125th anniversary.

But the city still raised a number of concerns with the university’s current plans for the site.

San Diego’s Independent Budget Analyst’s office said five main concerns remain over SDSU’s vision, as laid out in the university’s draft Environmental Impact Report.

The IBA office cited the purchase price, taxes and fees from private development, the city’s potential liability for the parcel after the sale and transfer has been finalized, the target closing date and the city’s responsibility for improvement projects resulting from development in Mission Valley.

San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott said her office viewed the university’s revised offer as a significant step forward, but not the final step. She said her office had not received concrete details from SDSU and thus sought clarification on key points of contention regarding the sale and transfer of the land.

She also said the university’s timeline for approving the sale and transfer of the site was aggressive.

“It’s not fair to represent to the public that we can complete all of this in a two-month frame,” Elliott said.

She also said her office would work to meet the university’s deadline while stressing the need for flexibility.

San Diego city council members also spoke about ongoing negotiations between the city and university.

Council members Barbra Bry and Jennifer Campbell said they supported the university’s timetable as laid out in the requested council action.

Both council members stressed the need to uphold the will of the voters and San Diego city taxpayers.

Councilmember Scott Sherman raised concerns over the university’s draft EIR and traffic mitigation plan. A memo released earlier on Monday urged the university to address “traffic mitigation flaws” he identified from the document.

The unanimous city council vote means city officials will update members regarding the PSA draft in mid-December. The vote also specified an outside closing date of December 2020, despite opposition from university officials. 

The meeting also featured public comments from members of the SDSU community, including SDSU Athletic Director J.D. Wicker, current Associated Students President Christian Onwuka and former SDSU men’s basketball coach Steve Fisher.

“This project could benefit the entire city and county of San Diego,” Fisher said.

Public comment in favor of the SDSU Mission Valley expansion plan urged the council to support the university’s vision. Speakers raised the issue of the need for university expansion, SDSU athletics, student success, sustainability and economic and academic growth.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email