The Daily Aztec

Campaign urges SDSU divestment

Photo courtesy of Facebook.

Photo courtesy of Facebook.

by Ana Ceballos

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

A group of San Diego State students began a campaign last month to urge university officials to divest from companies they say profit from anti-Palestinian Israeli policies.

The campaign is led by a diverse group of students who are members of Students for Justice in Palestine and the Student Union for Representation and Justice. However, only one Palestinian is involved.

The committee’s goal is to pressure the university’s administration to pull investments out of corporations such as Caterpillar, General Electric, Hewlett Packard and Motorola among other companies that “play a role in Israel’s war crimes and human rights violations.”

Nadir Bouhmouch, SDSU’s Students for Justice in Palestine co-chair, said the campaign was inspired by student boycotts that helped end South Africa’s racist regime 30 years ago.

“These students had such an important role in bringing down the apartheid regime and today we are doing it again. It’s the ethical thing to do,” television, film and new media and international security and conflict resolution senior Bouhmouch said.

In an effort to demand the university to pull investments, Bouhmouch said this is a non-violent approach to pressuring companies to stop doing business with Israel amid losing contracts or support from investors such as SDSU.

But opposition to the campaign emerged in an official statement from Hillel of San Diego at SDSU Director Jackie Tolley.

Tolley said “students at SDSU would be better served with an effort to support a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict” rather than a “resolution that is part of an international campaign whose hidden agenda is to eradicate the Jewish state and the only democracy in the Middle East.”

“To single out Jewish self-determination — or Zionism — for condemnation is itself a form of anti-Jewish racism,” Hillel said in the statement.

This spring, SDSU will join CSU Northridge to be the only two California State University campuses with student campaigns for divestment.

In the past two years, California campuses including the universities of California in Irvine, Berkeley and San Diego, have passed similar resolutions.

With the start of the campaign at SDSU, the resolution will now go through the legislative arms of Associated Students, the University Affairs Board, the University Council and finally the Board of Directors.

Ultimately, the university’s administration will take the Board of Directors’ advice into consideration and determine whether or not to go through with the resolution.

This decision is estimated to be made during the week of March 10.

“It will be a victory whether we win or lose, because we are using this campaign as an educational tool as well,” Bouhmouch said.

But Tolley considers the proposed resolution to be in need of “extraordinary resources” by A.S. when this is an international issue that she says most students on campus disagree on.

In the next month, SJP will hold student forums to present their case.

Both the SDSU divestment committee and Hillel are prepared to inform students about issues surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the campaign.

Photo courtesy of the Students for Justice in Palestine Facebook page. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
1 Comment

One Response to “Campaign urges SDSU divestment”

  1. J.J. Surbeck on February 19th, 2014 2:11 pm

    Let’s see… So far, 136,000 people, most of them innocent civilians, including over 10,000 children, have been slaughtered in neighboring Syria, but some of the Israel-obsessed students (and faculty) at SDSU have time only for the alleged oppression of the Palestinians! The sheer hypocrisy of the divestment supporters is mind-boggling. They would have a lot more credibility if they launched a campaign to divest from countries that violate human rights anywhere in the world. But no, for these exceedingly myopic and sectarian so-called activists, there can be only one culprit in the world: Israel. Any of the countless, considerably worse human rights violations that have been and are still taking place in so many other countries (most of them in the Muslim world), might as well not exist at all. Let’s have debates about oppression and human rights violations anywhere they take place, or let’s have none. How about divesting from China for their devastating and illegal occupation of Tibet since 1950 (still ongoing)? Why are these hypocrites not saying anything about it? Because it’s a lot easier to whip up frenzied self-righteous do-gooders against Israel in full knowledge that Israel is not going to retaliate against them than it is to criticize China, Turkey or Morocco, all illegally occupying territories that never belonged to them, and all prone to retaliate against any form of criticism. Because the anti-Israel divestment promoters are first-class hypocrites, their proposal to divest exclusively against Israel should be rejected outright by the AS and by SDSU. For a place that prides itself in fighting any type of discrimination, designating selectively only Israel to collective reproach and wrath is pure discrimination. As such, it is equally intolerable and must be rejected like any other form of discrimination.

Commenting on our site is a privilege. We want our readers to add their point of view to every story but ask that they keep their comments relevant to the topic at hand. We will remove comments and possibly ban users who do the following: (1) Use vulgar or racist language, (2) Threaten harm of any sort to staff, commenters or the subject of an article, and (3) Leave spam in their comment. If you have questions about these rules, please contact our Editor in Chief at:

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.